Last Words of Josh Jacobs, 25th-century Retro-hipster (“Last Words” Series

I am writing this FROM THE FUTURE!

Or maybe FROM THE PAST?

From the Writers of the Future gala, anyway. Hooray for automated posts.

Last words of Josh Jacobs, 25th-century Retro-hipster, upon Attempting to Ironically Use 20th-century Last Words to Draw Attention to His Dangerous Traversal of the Mega-highwire of Mars

by Stewart C Baker

Hey y’all, watch this!

(Unlike most of these little story-things, this one has not a thing to do with someone dying–it just turns the whole concept of last words on its head!)

My published original fiction from 2015 – in review (the dreaded “awards eligibility post”)

For SFF writers, there are two year-end traditions.

One is to post a list of your published fiction for the year so people who read for award nominations can be reminded it exists.

The second is to exhibit sufficient hand-wringing while you do it, so as to appear self-effacing, awkward, and not a giant bag of dicks.

So:

Hand-wringing?

Er, hang on a bit. Let me try that again.

Hand-wringing?!

Eh, good enough.

Anyway. now that that’s out of the way, here is a curated selection of my stories that saw first publication (or were first podcast) this year.

Just to be as clear as crystal, I am not expecting to end up on anyone’s awards list. But I hope you find something you like in the stories below, if you’re into that sort of thing.

Original Short Stories

“Configuring Your Quantum Disambiguator”Nature, February 4, 2015
Having trouble calibrating your universe-defining machine? Don’t lose your head. Just refer to these simple instructions… (meta-fiction; humour)
(Also currently shortlisted in the “Quantum Shorts” contest.)

“Masks”SFComet, March 2015 (Also in Chinese)
Min’s double life as an investigator and a spy aboard a generation ship is about to come crashing down… Unless she can out-think the man in the lizard mask.
(sci-fi)

“Love and Relativity”Nature Physics, September 1, 2015
When Adhi disappears on an experimental spacecraft, Indira tirelessly searches for answers. But life can’t stand still forever, and history has a funny way of repeating itself.
(sci-fi; meta-fiction)

“Fugue in a Minor Key”Galaxy’s Edge, November 2015 (note: available through 12/31)
The most important things in Katja’s life are her daughter, her husband, and her internationally acclaimed career as a concert pianist—but the two university techs before her insist they were all a simulation.
(sci-fi)

“Elements of a Successful Exit Broadcast”Fantastic Stories of the Imagination, November 2015
The last moments of your life can be among the most important. Spend them wisely; spend them well. Do not waste time on empty regret.
(sci-fi)

“Excerpt from the Diagnostic and Necromantic Manual, 5th Edition Regarding the Departed”The Sockdolager, Winter 2015
There are various methods of bringing loved ones back from the dead—but things don’t always go exactly as you plan.
(fantasy; meta-fiction)

Podcast Fiction

“Raising Words”Meduspod, February 2, 2015 (Print story published in Penumbra, July 2013)
When the man known as Yamato Takeru dies and transforms into a massive white spirit-bird, one of his daughters stands apart. She does not celebrate his godly transformation. Instead, she remembers…
(fantasy)

“Behind the First Years”StarShipSofa, September 16, 2015 (Print story published in COSMOS Online, 2013)
When his predecessor dies just before the ship they live on reaches its final destination, Pete is thrust into the role of archivist. Can he adapt? What waits in store on their new home?
(sci-fi)

These are just some of the stories I published this year (12 in all, 9 of which are original publications). You can see the full list on my bibliography page.

Thanks for your (probably hypothetical!) support during 2015, and I’m looking forward to another year’s worth of writing and publishing stories in 2016.

My story “Elements of a Successful Exit Broadcast” reviewed

I’ve spotted a couple of reviews out there on the Interwebs for my story “Elements of a Successful Exit Broadcast” in the November issue of Fantastic Stories of the Imagination. I know you’re not supposed to read the things, but I’m a glutton for self-abnegation and never could resist.

Charles Payseur of Quick Sip Reviews has some kind things to say about the story.

There is a great sense something terrible has happened, and that in some ways it takes being in such a situation to give advice on it. That this list is both a manual for others and its own successful exit broadcast. That it follows its own advice, though it slips a bit, as anyone would. That it keeps the pain just under the surface, slipping only momentarily up to show in the quiver of a lip, the hesitation in a word. It’s a gripping story, a very, very short story, and a fine read.

I’ll drink to that! Or I would, if I drank.

Alas and alack, David Wesley Hill of Tangent Online was less than impressed, and reads the story as being about someone who is “concerned about looking good while dying horribly”—not quite what I had in mind with this story, although I suppose it’s a fairly accurate surface level summary.

David does make a good point about this being an implausible set of instructions, but such is the nature of the piece’s second-person conceit. Somewhat more baffling to me is that he spends the rest of the review talking about the authentic smell of burning and/or rancid meat. As he says, “Details count, particularly in a story of 200 words.” And sure, I’ll agree with that. And sure maybe I should have deleted “rancid.” (I will admit that it’s mostly there for rhythm.) All the same, this aspect of David’s review still seems a little over the top to me.

Ah well. You can’t please everybody, right? I think that’s especially true for such a short piece as this one.

Looking for a writing activity in November? Come run the @WYRMsGauntlet !

If anyone out there in the wide world of Internet is looking for some kind of motivational writing thing to do in November that isn’t a novel, and/or would like a chance at $150, why not come join me over at Wyrm’s Gauntlet?

What exactly is that, you ask? The long version is available at the link above.

Here’s the short version:

WYRM’s Gauntlet is 4 rounds of writing or reviewing challenges, organized in a tournament style. Only 8 entrants move on to the second round, 5 to the third, and just 3 to the final round. Anyone who lasts to the finalist round earns a nice cash prize.

The challenges are things like “write a story” or “review this,” and all entries are submitted via a private web-form, so you don’t lose any rights to your work.

I’m already registered under the moniker of Flintonlaubakersmith. (Last year, as the less-gloriously-named s_c_baker, I won second place. I also, of more note to me personally, wrote the first draft of a story I cannot yet name because it won first place in Writers of the Future recently.)

If all this sounds like fun to you, go read through the Wyrms’ Gauntlet guidelines and sign up to be a “Gauntleteer.” The first round starts October 12th, but you can join any time before its deadline of October 26th.

Sockdolager Issue 1 Podcast

The Sockdolager, where my story “Aarne-Thompson Index for After the End of Things” appeared online this spring, has put together a podcast about that issue (which was their first).

I’m not normally one for podcasts (I don’t have the attention span, is what it boils down to), but it’s really fascinating to hear the editors talk about the process and the reasons for their choices for purchasing various stories and/or why they like them. (I must admit I am a little biased in this particular case, since one of the editors says my story is one of his favourite things they’ve published.)

If you like podcasts, fiction, or just that story of mine, go give them a listen. It’s interesting stuff!

The podcast is supported by their Patreon account, so if you like what they do and have the fundage to do so, you should also consider pledging there.

Read Annie Bellet’s Hugo-nominated “Goodnight Stars” online—free!

Sad Puppy controversy aside, this time of year is always great for getting a chance to read good, free fiction. Plenty of editors and authors make their nominated work more accessible in the run-up to voting, so that everyone who wants to read it can.

As an example of which, John Joseph Adams and Hugh Howey just made Annie Bellet’s Hugo-nominated short story “Goodnight Stars” available on the Apocalypse Triptych website free of charge. The story appeared in Adams’ and Howey’s “The End is Now,” the second volume in the anthology series.

This is my first time reading the story (I don’t have much of a budget for buying fiction, unfortunately), but it’s easy to see why it’s on the ballot. The characters are well-sketched, multi-layered, and sympathetic, the pacing is excellent, and the ending packs an emotional whammy.

So if you like apocalyptic stories, go give this one a read. (Even if you don’t like them, go give this one a read. It may change your mind.)

Update 4/15:
Annie has withdrawn her story from the ballot. Here’s why:

am withdrawing because this has become about something very different than great science fiction. I find my story, and by extension myself, stuck in a game of political dodge ball, where I’m both a conscripted player and also a ball. (Wrap your head around that analogy, if you can, ha!) All joy that might have come from this nomination has been co-opted, ruined, or sapped away. This is not about celebrating good writing anymore, and I don’t want to be a part of what it has become.

I am not a ball. I do not want to be a player. This is not what my writing is about. This is not why I write. I believe in a compassionate, diverse, and inclusive world. I try to write my own take on human experiences and relationships, and present my fiction as entertainingly and honestly as I can.

“Raising Words” now available as a free podcast at @MedusPod

My story “Raising Words,” from the July 2014 issue of Penumbra, has been reprinted as a free podcast over at MedusPod.

It’s a story set in an approximation of Yamato Japan (around the late 600s), and features the legendary warrior Yamato Takeru, shape-changing boar-god-things, and other weirdness. Go check it out!

This is my first time being podcast(ed?), as I’m generally a much more text-based person. I hope you enjoy, in any case!

Listen to Raising Words at MedusPod.

Why Sad Puppies makes me angry

So, Sad Puppies. Sad Puppies makes me angry.

And just to be clear, what I take to be objectionable about the whole thing—what pisses me off almost to the point of incoherence—is not (for the most part) the authors who are on the list. And I frankly could not care less about whether Sad Puppies “gamed” the Hugos (because that is basically how the Hugos work).

What makes me so angry about all this is the argument that people interested in social justice—and who put it in their fiction either explicitly or just by dealing with topics that are other-than-male, other-than-white, other-than-straight—are “ruining” the genre, and that if you speak up on behalf of actual social justice and equality, you are essentially shouted down and called a Nazi (the perpetual comparison of Feminisms and other social justice movements to murdering millions of people always baffles and angers me. In fact, it is not a matter of ‘cultural Leninism’ to strive for equality. It is not ‘authoritarian’ or ‘fascist’ to suggest that, hey, maybe we should give traditionally underprivileged groups some kind of fair treatment. There is, in fact, a difference between actual discrimination and the mere loss of privilege.).

What makes me angry is the co-opting of social justice language (“We’re being shut out by the political/cultural elite!”) to make what is basically an argument that marginalizes anything other than the “default,” and which paints the “old way of doing things” or whatever as a magical place full of butterflies, rainbows, and happiness for everybody everywhere forever, which is now ruined because minorities are whiny. (Another news flash: that’s only true if you happened to be a straight white man.)

What makes me angry, in short, is the rhetoric of inclusion being used to say “All those people of colour and other minorities who got on the Hugo slate? They’re only there because of left-wing politics, and not because they earned it.”

Because, make no mistake, that IS the Sad Puppies platform:

Likewise, we’ve seen the Hugo voting skew ideological, as Worldcon and fandom alike have tended to use the Hugos as an affirmative action award: giving Hugos because a writer or artist is (insert underrepresented minority or victim group here) or because a given work features (insert underrepresented minority or victim group here) characters.

This argument is—among other things—incredibly disrespectful to anyone who happens to be other than straight, white, and male and who has also placed on the Hugo ballot in previous years. Ann Leckie? Totally just there because politics. N.K. Jemisin? Politics rears its ugly head again—she clearly couldn’t have been on there otherwise. I mean, gosh, nobody even reads the things those people write, so how else could they be there?!

It’s a toxic, noxious, disrespectful argument. And I’m not going to pretend I don’t have an issue with that being the basis on which a platform is built, because I do—even though I have a few friends on the slate who I think genuinely do deserve more recognition for their work.

Anyway, for the majority of the people who are on the current Hugo ballot, my message is: Congratulations. I’m happy for you—honestly, I am. If you’re there because you’re an awesome writer, that’s a fantastic achievement, and you shouldn’t let the political bullshit pushed by the Sad Puppies crowd get you down.

For the few who are there purely because those with like-minded politics voted you in, well … I think it’s going to be pretty obvious whenever a voter opens up your work.

And Sad Puppies’ central argument that politics is ruining science fiction? Fuck that bullshit.

If you want a link that talks about this in a more calm and reasoned manner (of which I am totally incapable), here:

  • A Detailed Explanation – A very long post, which breaks down the Sad Puppies platform and rhetoric piece by piece and makes (in my view) very compelling arguments against it. Summary excerpt: “I think SF has always had ideology behind it; and that there’s no appreciable increase in ideology in recent Hugo novels; and that it’s better to read a text ideologically than not, because ideology is always there; and that, in the end, the current ideology Torgersen finds in SF is more important to me personally and to the culture at large than past ideology.”

And other good reads on it all: